<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for nine months for life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ninemonthsforlife.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ninemonthsforlife.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on My Mutated Meme by AmyBow</title>
		<link>http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/03/27/my-mutated-meme/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>AmyBow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/03/27/my-mutated-meme/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>An amendment to #1: Real moms don;t flinch when talking about boobs, body fluid or bodily functions. In fact, we find it odd when others look at us funny when we do discuss these things openly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An amendment to #1: Real moms don;t flinch when talking about boobs, body fluid or bodily functions. In fact, we find it odd when others look at us funny when we do discuss these things openly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doggone good! by maya</title>
		<link>http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/03/18/doggone-good/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>maya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/03/18/doggone-good/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Kags,
Watch this video. 
http://www.nammamane.com/2007/03/19/savis-day/
My husband works really hard to make the dogs feel that they are a part of the family, but the baby is an extension of us. I think our dogs understand their limits. Once our little one starts movign around a lot faster, we will have to tech her the limits ;)
-maya</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kags,<br />
Watch this video.<br />
<a href="http://www.nammamane.com/2007/03/19/savis-day/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nammamane.com/2007/03/19/savis-day/</a><br />
My husband works really hard to make the dogs feel that they are a part of the family, but the baby is an extension of us. I think our dogs understand their limits. Once our little one starts movign around a lot faster, we will have to tech her the limits ;)<br />
-maya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doggone good! by Kags</title>
		<link>http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/03/18/doggone-good/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Kags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/03/18/doggone-good/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I have a 7 1/2 month old and 2 dogs as well. . . but I am still a little nervous about the interplay, especially now that K is crawling and the dogs have had an epiphany that this little blob moves around on THEIR turf.  The older dog (2.5 years) is great -- lots of kisses.  The younger one (1.5 years) is still a bit nervous, but is a more nervous dog.  I look forward to reading more on your blog about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 7 1/2 month old and 2 dogs as well. . . but I am still a little nervous about the interplay, especially now that K is crawling and the dogs have had an epiphany that this little blob moves around on THEIR turf.  The older dog (2.5 years) is great &#8212; lots of kisses.  The younger one (1.5 years) is still a bit nervous, but is a more nervous dog.  I look forward to reading more on your blog about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sleep Deprivation Redefined. by AmyBow</title>
		<link>http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/03/20/sleep-deprivation-redefined/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>AmyBow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/03/20/sleep-deprivation-redefined/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>This is brilliant. People constantly tell me I look tired. I am wondering when they will stop saying that and just accept that this is how I will look for the next 5-10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is brilliant. People constantly tell me I look tired. I am wondering when they will stop saying that and just accept that this is how I will look for the next 5-10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;ll have another baby please &#8230;and make it to-go ;) by Pranam Kolari</title>
		<link>http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/03/13/ill-have-another-baby-please-and-make-it-to-go/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Pranam Kolari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/03/13/ill-have-another-baby-please-and-make-it-to-go/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>ROFL !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROFL !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To Einstein or not to Einstein, that is the question&#8230; by AmyBow</title>
		<link>http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/02/15/to-einstein-or-not-to-einstein-that-is-the-question/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>AmyBow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/02/15/to-einstein-or-not-to-einstein-that-is-the-question/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Wow! There was a lot of information in the last comment! I have a 9 month old that doesn't watch any TV at this point. She is occasionally in the room when I have the TV on, but it is nothing she is interested in and she rarely even glances at it. I feel that taking her to the mall is sort of like interactive TV for her. She sits still and watches all of these crazy things transpire around her. For now, I think the live entertainment is more stimulating for both of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! There was a lot of information in the last comment! I have a 9 month old that doesn&#8217;t watch any TV at this point. She is occasionally in the room when I have the TV on, but it is nothing she is interested in and she rarely even glances at it. I feel that taking her to the mall is sort of like interactive TV for her. She sits still and watches all of these crazy things transpire around her. For now, I think the live entertainment is more stimulating for both of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To Einstein or not to Einstein, that is the question&#8230; by Adam</title>
		<link>http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/02/15/to-einstein-or-not-to-einstein-that-is-the-question/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/02/15/to-einstein-or-not-to-einstein-that-is-the-question/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your post. I'm actually a producer of children's media and find it frustrating when companies implicity imply that watching their programs will make you smarter.  That being said, I obviously don't think it makes sense to be too dogmatic about it either way.  As you probably have heard, the American Academy of Pediatrics has suggested that children under the age of 2 watch no TV at all.  However, they only cite this opinion because no specific studies were conducted on infants' television viewing habits.  This relative dearth of support led them to make the conclusion that "until more research is done about the effects of TV on very young children, the AAP does not recommend television for children younger than two years of age." I think it's worthwhile to emphasize that no distinction was made between educational programming and regular passive television viewing. I also think it's worth mentioning that, in the same article, the AAP elaborates that "studies show that preschool children who watch educational TV programs do better on reading and math tests than children who do not watch those programs. When used carefully, television can be a positive tool to help your child learn." 

Perhaps a more detailed research piece was published just a few years ago in "Pediatrics" by scientists at Children's Hospital &#38; Regional Medical Center. The study explained that television in general tends to over-stimulate infants and may lead to problems associated with attention deficit. Once again, the study did not differentiate between the different "kinds" of programs that were watched. However, lead researcher, Dr. Dimitri Christakis felt that attention deficit in children was related to the unrealistically fast-paced visual images typical of most TV programming. Since the advent of the remote control, it seems programmers have grown fearful of viewers' changing the channel which would mean lost revenues for the networks. To maintain an engaged audience, images flash from cut to cut as rapidly as a standard music video which enthusiastically caters to a generation of shorter attention spans. It seems clear how this could be incredibly detrimental to an infant that is just starting to associate images on television with real life communications. Ironically enough, the very issue that seems to be scarring the industry in which we participate, is part of our mission statement - to show content in a slow and deliberate manner. 

In general, we think it's fair to say that anything can be damaging in extremes and the key should be more about moderation. According to a survey conducted by The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 61% of children under 1 watch TV every day and another one-third of children under 6 actually have televisions in their bedrooms. This to me is startling. We have a three year old daughter and her television viewing is quite limited and controlled. When we do allow her to watch our videos, we typically watch them together and talk about the scenes and sing along with the songs. Completely ignoring videos as a medium for learning and communication seems dogmatic. 

Still, not all videos are created equally. We were actually inspired to create our own series out of dissatisfaction with the options so popular on the market today. It is concerning that so many titles imply that merely watching their videos will make a child smarter. We think it's more important to highlight the enjoyment and exposure to language and music that can be both fun and beneficial for the interaction between parent and child. 

In particular, some of the qualities we think are important in a video include:

Interactivity - Look for videos that include interactive guides or include content that can act as a springboard to interactivity between parent and child. An interesting study conducted out of The University of Washington showed that infants exposed to television learned language skills exponentially faster when viewed together with a caregiver who could help interpret and synthesize what was being watched. 

Slow paced and intentional - As an alternative to videos that seem to hypnotize children into sedation through random images, content with simple vignettes and logical imagery may prove to be more beneficial. 

Simple dialog and characters with individual personalities - Research has shown that infants identify with faces which may prove to be a valuable introduction to language. Also, infants are capable of understanding human emotions and interaction. Watching recognizable scenarios with characters may assist is shaping positive social interaction.

Reviewed by trusted experts.

Music and singing - While we wish there was more evidence which supported the belief that merely subjecting a child to classical music will make them smarter, we personally have a passion for it. Belinda is a composer who has dedicated her life to this love. We, therefore, found it very important to expose our child to music. However, we would be skeptical of any company that claims or suggests that it will make children smarter. Still, for preverbal infants, music is a wonderful way for parents to communicate with their babies, especially by singing to them. In a study done by the University of Toronto, videotaped singing performances were shown to be quite effective for developing infants and are now even employed for therapeutic uses including regulating emotion in disabled or sick children. 

The bottom line is that it is important to use your own judgment. Make sure that the videos and programs that you choose are reflective of your own values, imagination, and interests that you hope to encourage or feel are important for your child to be exposed to. Television and video viewing is easily vilified but when used in moderation and appropriately, can be an incredibly effective medium to educate, stimulate, and entertain. By the way, if you like, we'd be more than happy to send you one of our DVDs - we'd really be interested to hear your thoughts, criticisms, and opinions. Send us an email and let us know.

Thanks again!
Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your post. I&#8217;m actually a producer of children&#8217;s media and find it frustrating when companies implicity imply that watching their programs will make you smarter.  That being said, I obviously don&#8217;t think it makes sense to be too dogmatic about it either way.  As you probably have heard, the American Academy of Pediatrics has suggested that children under the age of 2 watch no TV at all.  However, they only cite this opinion because no specific studies were conducted on infants&#8217; television viewing habits.  This relative dearth of support led them to make the conclusion that &#8220;until more research is done about the effects of TV on very young children, the AAP does not recommend television for children younger than two years of age.&#8221; I think it&#8217;s worthwhile to emphasize that no distinction was made between educational programming and regular passive television viewing. I also think it&#8217;s worth mentioning that, in the same article, the AAP elaborates that &#8220;studies show that preschool children who watch educational TV programs do better on reading and math tests than children who do not watch those programs. When used carefully, television can be a positive tool to help your child learn.&#8221; </p>
<p>Perhaps a more detailed research piece was published just a few years ago in &#8220;Pediatrics&#8221; by scientists at Children&#8217;s Hospital &amp; Regional Medical Center. The study explained that television in general tends to over-stimulate infants and may lead to problems associated with attention deficit. Once again, the study did not differentiate between the different &#8220;kinds&#8221; of programs that were watched. However, lead researcher, Dr. Dimitri Christakis felt that attention deficit in children was related to the unrealistically fast-paced visual images typical of most TV programming. Since the advent of the remote control, it seems programmers have grown fearful of viewers&#8217; changing the channel which would mean lost revenues for the networks. To maintain an engaged audience, images flash from cut to cut as rapidly as a standard music video which enthusiastically caters to a generation of shorter attention spans. It seems clear how this could be incredibly detrimental to an infant that is just starting to associate images on television with real life communications. Ironically enough, the very issue that seems to be scarring the industry in which we participate, is part of our mission statement - to show content in a slow and deliberate manner. </p>
<p>In general, we think it&#8217;s fair to say that anything can be damaging in extremes and the key should be more about moderation. According to a survey conducted by The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 61% of children under 1 watch TV every day and another one-third of children under 6 actually have televisions in their bedrooms. This to me is startling. We have a three year old daughter and her television viewing is quite limited and controlled. When we do allow her to watch our videos, we typically watch them together and talk about the scenes and sing along with the songs. Completely ignoring videos as a medium for learning and communication seems dogmatic. </p>
<p>Still, not all videos are created equally. We were actually inspired to create our own series out of dissatisfaction with the options so popular on the market today. It is concerning that so many titles imply that merely watching their videos will make a child smarter. We think it&#8217;s more important to highlight the enjoyment and exposure to language and music that can be both fun and beneficial for the interaction between parent and child. </p>
<p>In particular, some of the qualities we think are important in a video include:</p>
<p>Interactivity - Look for videos that include interactive guides or include content that can act as a springboard to interactivity between parent and child. An interesting study conducted out of The University of Washington showed that infants exposed to television learned language skills exponentially faster when viewed together with a caregiver who could help interpret and synthesize what was being watched. </p>
<p>Slow paced and intentional - As an alternative to videos that seem to hypnotize children into sedation through random images, content with simple vignettes and logical imagery may prove to be more beneficial. </p>
<p>Simple dialog and characters with individual personalities - Research has shown that infants identify with faces which may prove to be a valuable introduction to language. Also, infants are capable of understanding human emotions and interaction. Watching recognizable scenarios with characters may assist is shaping positive social interaction.</p>
<p>Reviewed by trusted experts.</p>
<p>Music and singing - While we wish there was more evidence which supported the belief that merely subjecting a child to classical music will make them smarter, we personally have a passion for it. Belinda is a composer who has dedicated her life to this love. We, therefore, found it very important to expose our child to music. However, we would be skeptical of any company that claims or suggests that it will make children smarter. Still, for preverbal infants, music is a wonderful way for parents to communicate with their babies, especially by singing to them. In a study done by the University of Toronto, videotaped singing performances were shown to be quite effective for developing infants and are now even employed for therapeutic uses including regulating emotion in disabled or sick children. </p>
<p>The bottom line is that it is important to use your own judgment. Make sure that the videos and programs that you choose are reflective of your own values, imagination, and interests that you hope to encourage or feel are important for your child to be exposed to. Television and video viewing is easily vilified but when used in moderation and appropriately, can be an incredibly effective medium to educate, stimulate, and entertain. By the way, if you like, we&#8217;d be more than happy to send you one of our DVDs - we&#8217;d really be interested to hear your thoughts, criticisms, and opinions. Send us an email and let us know.</p>
<p>Thanks again!<br />
Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To Einstein or not to Einstein, that is the question&#8230; by pkolari</title>
		<link>http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/02/15/to-einstein-or-not-to-einstein-that-is-the-question/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>pkolari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/02/15/to-einstein-or-not-to-einstein-that-is-the-question/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Its so true that we sometimes expect a child to look at a square window when the whole world around her is much more interesting. We just need to be always cognizant that all of these "tools" exist to make our lives as working parents easier and is not a replacement for "real" interaction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its so true that we sometimes expect a child to look at a square window when the whole world around her is much more interesting. We just need to be always cognizant that all of these &#8220;tools&#8221; exist to make our lives as working parents easier and is not a replacement for &#8220;real&#8221; interaction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To Einstein or not to Einstein, that is the question&#8230; by Matt</title>
		<link>http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/02/15/to-einstein-or-not-to-einstein-that-is-the-question/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/02/15/to-einstein-or-not-to-einstein-that-is-the-question/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I think they serve a purpose.  But I think, too, that at this stage interraction with people and dogs are more important.

If you have some of the ones which introduce the alphabet or do sign language or numbers or ...  I think they have a lot of value; when she's old enough for them.  But right now she'll get more out of playing with mommy.

IMNSHO, of course!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they serve a purpose.  But I think, too, that at this stage interraction with people and dogs are more important.</p>
<p>If you have some of the ones which introduce the alphabet or do sign language or numbers or &#8230;  I think they have a lot of value; when she&#8217;s old enough for them.  But right now she&#8217;ll get more out of playing with mommy.</p>
<p>IMNSHO, of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Butt wait, I think I discovered something &#8230;. by Vee</title>
		<link>http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/02/08/butt-wait-i-think-i-discovered-something/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Vee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ninemonthsforlife.com/2007/02/08/butt-wait-i-think-i-discovered-something/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>i guess that's because people here usually sit on the floor, so an electric/heated carpet is  a necessity... feels wonderful when temp drops below 0.. posted some pics on http://flickr.com/photos/vidya22475 

give Savi a kiss from all of us here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess that&#8217;s because people here usually sit on the floor, so an electric/heated carpet is  a necessity&#8230; feels wonderful when temp drops below 0.. posted some pics on <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/vidya22475" rel="nofollow">http://flickr.com/photos/vidya22475</a> </p>
<p>give Savi a kiss from all of us here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
